iFANN
    iFANNを検索...
    ログイン
    ホーム
    ニュース
    動画
    写真
    GIF
    見つける
    投票
    アワード
    iFAMOUS
    ウィキ
    アニメ
    ルーム
    通知
    メッセージ
    ブックマーク
    プロフィール
    ウィキアワードiFAMOUSランキング業界クリエイター報酬ユーザー報酬利用規約プライバシーコミュニティガイドライン削除申請 / DMCAヘルプ開発者

    © 2026 iFANN

    ホーム
    検索
    メッセージ
    お知らせ
    プロフィール

    投稿

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 いいね48 低評価90 リポスト3 コメント
    ?

    コメント

    まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを投稿しましょう!

    投稿

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 いいね48 低評価90 リポスト3 コメント
    ?

    コメント

    まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを投稿しましょう!