iFANN
    iFANNを検索...
    ログイン
    ホーム
    ニュース
    動画
    写真
    GIF
    見つける
    投票
    アワード
    iFAMOUS
    ウィキ
    アニメ
    ルーム
    通知
    メッセージ
    ブックマーク
    プロフィール
    ウィキアワードiFAMOUSランキング業界クリエイター報酬ユーザー報酬利用規約プライバシーコミュニティガイドライン削除申請 / DMCAヘルプ開発者

    © 2026 iFANN

    ホーム
    検索
    メッセージ
    お知らせ
    プロフィール

    投稿

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 いいね0 低評価0 リポスト0 コメント
    ?

    コメント

    まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを投稿しましょう!

    投稿

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 いいね0 低評価0 リポスト0 コメント
    ?

    コメント

    まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを投稿しましょう!