iFANN
    iFANNを検索...
    ログイン
    ホーム
    ニュース
    動画
    写真
    GIF
    見つける
    投票
    アワード
    iFAMOUS
    ウィキ
    アニメ
    ルーム
    通知
    メッセージ
    ブックマーク
    プロフィール
    ウィキアワードiFAMOUSランキング業界クリエイター報酬ユーザー報酬利用規約プライバシーコミュニティガイドライン削除申請 / DMCAヘルプ開発者

    © 2026 iFANN

    ホーム
    検索
    メッセージ
    お知らせ
    プロフィール

    投稿

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    🏢Supreme Court of the United States🏛️Harvard University💭Politics

    UCLA Law School admissions DOJ 2026

    Pick a race, any race, and try writing a rule that skips them on purpose. Since 1964, federal law has said you can't do that in either direction. That's the theory. For decades before it, and in plenty of offices after, the one group that could be legally passed over in admissions, in hiring, and in government contract decisions was white people. The word for it was never discrimination. Diversity was the label. Meanwhile the bar went down for one group and up for another, and Asian applicants got cut right along with white ones. That is the thing that cracked open the case against Harvard. 2023: the Supreme Court shut the schemes down at universities. 2025: the requirement for federal contractors to run affirmative action got dropped, and the majority finally got the same footing in lawsuits as everyone else. Paperwork doesn't sync to reality on day one. By 2026, the Department of Justice recorded that UCLA Law School was filtering out white and Asian applicants whose scores matched the ones it accepted. That gap between the statute and the office is the part worth staring at.

    1h

    18 いいね0 低評価3 リポスト0 コメント
    ?

    コメント

    まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを投稿しましょう!

    投稿

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    🏢Supreme Court of the United States🏛️Harvard University💭Politics

    UCLA Law School admissions DOJ 2026

    Pick a race, any race, and try writing a rule that skips them on purpose. Since 1964, federal law has said you can't do that in either direction. That's the theory. For decades before it, and in plenty of offices after, the one group that could be legally passed over in admissions, in hiring, and in government contract decisions was white people. The word for it was never discrimination. Diversity was the label. Meanwhile the bar went down for one group and up for another, and Asian applicants got cut right along with white ones. That is the thing that cracked open the case against Harvard. 2023: the Supreme Court shut the schemes down at universities. 2025: the requirement for federal contractors to run affirmative action got dropped, and the majority finally got the same footing in lawsuits as everyone else. Paperwork doesn't sync to reality on day one. By 2026, the Department of Justice recorded that UCLA Law School was filtering out white and Asian applicants whose scores matched the ones it accepted. That gap between the statute and the office is the part worth staring at.

    1h

    18 いいね0 低評価3 リポスト0 コメント
    ?

    コメント

    まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを投稿しましょう!